Transcripts of judgments in U.S. District and Circuit Courts, 1831-1836.

ArchivalResource

Transcripts of judgments in U.S. District and Circuit Courts, 1831-1836.

This series consists of transcripts of dockets of judgments in the U.S. Circuit Court and District Courts for the Southern District of New York.

0.2 cu. ft.

Information

SNAC Resource ID: 8271157

Related Entities

There are 4 Entities related to this resource.

New York (State). Court of Appeals

http://n2t.net/ark:/99166/w61k37sb (corporateBody)

CURRENT FUNCTIONS. The court of appeals is New York State's highest court and court of last resort with appellate jurisdiction only. It hears cases on appeal from other appellate courts and sometimes from trial courts. Its review is generally limited to questions of law; in capital cases it may rule on both law and fact. The court of appeals also reviews determinations of the Commission on Judicial Conduct. ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY. Under British colonial rule, appeals fro...

United States. Circuit Court (New York : Southern District)

http://n2t.net/ark:/99166/w64x9njt (corporateBody)

New York (State). Supreme Court of Judicature

http://n2t.net/ark:/99166/w6km3905 (corporateBody)

Between 1786 and 1829 the Supreme Court and the county courts of common pleas shared with the Surrogate's Courts the power to prove and record wills devising real property, and also wills whose witnesses were unable to appear in court. In addition, between 1801 and 1829 the Supreme Court had the exclusive power to prove and record wills devising real property located in several counties. (Wills proved in the courts of common pleas were recorded by the county clerks). After a will was proved and ...

United States. District Court (New York : Southern District)

http://n2t.net/ark:/99166/w6kh4m8t (corporateBody)

Konrad Bercovici was a screenwriter who became close friends with actor and director Charlie Chaplin. In this lawsuit, Bercovici claimed that Chaplin had plagiarized from him the idea for Chaplin's film "The Great Dictator." The case went to trial in 1947, with Louis Nizer and Walter S. Beck of law firm Davidson & Davidson representing the plaintiff, and Louis D. Frohlich, Arthur H. Schwartz, and Everett A. Frohlich of Schwartz & Frohlich representing the defendant. The case was settled ...